Signature Assessment #2 (SA#2) is a more and deeper activity than SA#1. You should take a bit of time to review the instructions that are provided here. Please, use these instructions and rubric to accomplish this task. So, without further ado, here we go…
Reference: RS6539 Sample Proposal via Rubric Assessment-1.pdfDownload RS6539 Sample Proposal via Rubric Assessment-1.pdf
Step 1: BEFORE you begin, the Proposal presented here is NOT…IS NOT the goal of this Signature Assessment #2 (the example here is to help you with how structure might appear in your original research outcome). The goal of this Signature Assessment #2 is to write an original research on one of the topics presented below. It is a formal research activity and must include the elements as noted below. This research includes a compilation of what we have discussed and will include elements we will include as we continue in the semester. Once you have finished, you are to submit this research work for assessment based on the rubric indicated here.
Step 2: You are to include the following in your original research project: a. Cover Page, Abstract on the cover page, and a Table of Contents with dot leaders; [Cover Page & Abstract = 20 Points; Table of Contents = 10 Points] b. Introduction = 10 Points c. Items to be included: 1 Table = 10 Points; 1 Figure = 10 Points; 1 Graphic (from the review of the literature, and you must cite this as a source to support your work = 10 Points) d. Summary or Conclusion = 10 Points e. Body = 100 Points (Spelling, syntax, spacing, margins, font, etc.) f. Sources/Citations: APA Formatted = 20 Points
Save this under the filename: Signature Assignment 2. Submit by Week 14 or earlier, if you complete this exercise.
Topics to be researched: Please keep this activity to 6-8-10 pages or so. Please, no 27 pages for this activity. But, please be complete…thanks, DrK 1. Soft Skills to support the Workforce 2. Grade Inflation and how it harms skill sets 3. Dangers of Social Media to Young People 4. A topic of your choosing. Must be discussed and approved to avoid a topic of ‘scope creep.’