Can this be done by Friday 11/17week6TheoryApp

****Feedback on assignmemnt 3***Thank you for your work on this assignment. I think you are off to a great start, with a few adjustments to be made. I really liked that the theory selected can be applied to human behavior of those in the case study. Be sure to identify the current stage of development and discussed the challenges and conflicts of the characters at that stated. I made some recommendations on how some criterion might achieve a higher performance score. I look forward to reading more of your work.

Applying a particular theoretical approach to a case is always part of a larger context—in a general sense, who are the clients you are serving? What are the characteristics of the environment in which you work? Given that, what theoretical framework will work best? Do you need flexibility, or a laser-sharp focus? In this assignment, you will have an opportunity to answer those questions. Do careful research, and support your conclusions with relevant evidence.

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following competencies and behaviors:

  • Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.​
    • C6.GP.A: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks to engage with clients and constituencies.​
      • Related Assignment Criteria:
        • 1. Describe how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.
        • 2. Critique and apply knowledge to understand a person and environment.
  • Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.​
    • C7.GP.B: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the analysis of assessment data from clients and constituencies.​
      • Related Assignment Criteria:
        • 1. Describe how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.​
        • 2. Critique and apply knowledge to understand a person and environment.
  • Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
    • C8.GP.B: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in interventions with clients and constituencies.
      • Related Assignment Criteria:
        • 1. Describe how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.​
        • 2. Critique and apply knowledge to understand a person and environment.
  • Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
    • C9.GP.B: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the evaluation of outcomes.
      • Related Assignment Criteria:
        • 1. Describe how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.​
        • 2. Critique and apply knowledge to understand a person and environment.

Assignment Description

In your previous assignment, you identified and analyzed a specific theory to apply in the Joe the King case study. In this assignment, you will build on the work you have done by deciding an actual application. As with last time, it is vital to support the application of your chosen theory with scholarly research in the Capella University Library.

Assignment Instructions

The bullet points below correspond to grading criteria in the rubric. You may also want to read the rubric to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. For this assignment, complete the following:

  • Describe how the theory you selected can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.
  • Discuss why you believe your chosen theory will be most valuable to you in your social work practice.
  • Compare and contrast the theory you selected with at least two other theories, explaining why the theory you selected is a better fit for your practice.

Additional Requirements

The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:

  • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
  • Cited resources: Minimum of three scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
  • Length of paper: Minimum of four typed, double-spaced pages.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • Due date: The assignment must be submitted to your instructor in the courseroom by the end of this week.

Resources

View RubricWeek 6 Assignment – Theory ApplicationWeek 6 Assignment – Theory ApplicationCriteriaRatingsPtsDescribe how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation. (C6.GP.A,C7.GP.B, C8.GP.B, C9.GP.B)view longer description30 to >25.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDescribes how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation and offers insight into real-world application.25.5 to >21 ptsPROFICIENTDescribes how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.21 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies how general theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe how the selected theory can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation./ 30 ptsCritique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment. (C6.GP.A, C7.GP.B, C8.GP.B, C9.GP.B)view longer description30 to >25.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDCritiques and applies knowledge to understand person and environment with clear examples provided.25.5 to >21 ptsPROFICIENTCritiques and applies knowledge to understand person and environment.21 to >0 ptsBASICDiscusses person and environment.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment./ 30 ptsProvide documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study.view longer description30 to >25.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDProvides documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study with clear connections to why it is the most appropriate theory.25.5 to >21 ptsPROFICIENTProvides documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study.21 to >0 ptsBASICProvides limited documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not provide documented examples that support the application of the selected theory to a particular case study./ 30 ptsExplain how the theory guides social work practice both with individuals and families.view longer description30 to >25.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDExplains how the theory guides social work practice both with individuals and families and offers insight into real-world application.25.5 to >21 ptsPROFICIENTExplains how the theory guides social work practice both with individuals and families.21 to >0 ptsBASICDescribes how the theory guides social work practice both with individuals and families.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe how the theory guides social work practice both with individuals and families./ 30 ptsCommunicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.view longer description30 to >25.5 ptsDISTINGUISHEDCommunicates with exceptional clarity in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.25.5 to >21 ptsPROFICIENTCommunicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.21 to >0 ptsBASICCommunicates in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not communicate in a manner that is consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.

NEED A CUSTOMIZED PAPER ON THE ABOVE DETAILS?

Submit your order now!