Respond to 2 students discussion using the rise Model
Due Friday September 1, 2023 by 11:00 pm
Must Read Everything:
Reply to at least two classmate’s posts, applying the RISE Model for Meaningful Feedback
I will also show an example below of how the response needs to be addressed.
Here’s an example of how the response should look. Please don’t copy it.
The response to the classmate need to be just like this.
Example Response (Response Needs to be writen just like the response below No copying)
RISE Feedback:
REFLECT: I concur with “Action plans should reflect the type of services that are needed and have an idea of the expected outcome of the services” because it is in line with Hatch and Hartline’s intentional school counseling guidelines in regards to determining students needs.
INQUIRE: Can you further explain what “closing-the-gap action plans” are?
SUGGEST: I encourage you to revisit Hatch and Hartline’s MTMDSS tier interventions in order to add a citation that would illustrate your example on bullying prevention efforts.
ELEVATE: What if you re-purposed “For example, after a needs assessment, the school is having problems with bullying” as “Following Trish Hatch’s MTMDSS tier based interventions, if the school is having problems with bullying, after a needs assessment, we could… citation…” for a more weighted argument?
ReferencesHatch, T., & Hartline, J. (2022). The use of data in school counseling: Hatching results (and so much more) for students, programs and the profession (2nd Ed.). Corwin.
****PLEASE RESPOND IN DEPTH***************************************************
Below are the two classmate discussion post that you will need to respond to
************************************************
Classmate response 1- Abigail
How well do the career development theories discussed in Chapter 3 of Career Development Interventions address individuals from diverse backgrounds? Guide career behavior? Guide career decision-making?
When reading about Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) and how this theory applies to career development, it was interesting to learn about findings regarding diverse backgrounds and their relation to career development. SCCT is useful when applying it to persistence at overcoming obstacles. This can be analyzed through self-efficacy. Niles and Harris-Bowlsbey (2017) mention that “self-efficacy beliefs are low due to factors such as racism and sex-role stereotyping, clients can be exposed to personally relevant, vicarious learning opportunities.” By knowing this, interventions can be applied to address individuals from diverse backgrounds, in order to strengthen their self-efficacy. The text also explains how the Cognitive Information Processing (CIP) addresses how individuals can make career decisions through a three-factor Parsonian model. This theory’s interventions address career decision-making through different dimensions. These dimensions are: the pyramid of information processing, the Communication, Analysis, Synthesis, Valuing, and Execution (CASVE) cycle of decision-making skills; and the executive processing domain (Niles and Harris-Bowlsbey, 2017).
How does Social Cognitive Career Theory and Krumboltz’s theory influence career outcomes? How do these theories guide and emphasize your own personal career?
According to both of these theories, there are several factors that influence career decision making. Whether it be as a result of self efficacy or unpredictable social factors, I think that these theories have both guided my own personal career. For example, I decided to further my education after high school as a result of my own self-efficacy because I believed that I was capable of such attainment. At the same time, there were other social factors that I could not control, but directed to towards the path of my career. One of the major factors is the economic factor. I felt and continue to feel like without seeking an appropriate career, there is a large financial factor that plays a role because what we do for a living and how much money we make essentially controls everything else in our lives.
How might your own cultural background affect the efficacy of the career intervention strategies you chose to use with your students?
I think that my own cultural background affects the efficacy of the career intervention strategies I choose to use with my students because I believe that career decision-making is a result of my own self-efficacy which may result in me taking a SCCT approach when working with students. At the same time, I believe that I can incorporate this into SEL curriculum because they will be able to build confidence and also have a positive attitude towards themselves and what they feel capable of. This may also go hand in hand with teaching students to have a growth mindset.
*****************************************************************************************
Classmate response 2- Bianca
- How well do the career development theories discussed in Chapter 3 of Career Development Interventions address individuals from diverse backgrounds? Guide career behavior? Guide career decision-making?
The first one that can be a barrier can be the financial situation, that may be one of the biggest one that there might not be money so they will have to go to work to be able to support the family. The next one can be that they might be first generation, not a lot of information or motivation might be there, but with the proper support and information they can take advantage of all the resources that can be offered to first gen college students.
- How does Social Cognitive Career Theory and Krumboltz’s theory influence career outcomes? How do these theories guide and emphasize your own personal career?
Krumbolt’z theory I feel that was a big influence in where I am right now in life with the life transitions and approach them positively. Growing up I was close to my uncle and he was a teacher and when I was on vacation I would go with him. I then felt the love and passion he had for teaching, so I wanted to do the same positive changes and impact. Once I started college, I was easily drawn out of it and stopped going to college. I then started working at a local grocery store which I thought was a good paying job. After a couple years I couldn’t afford it so I got a second job at a local after school program and that is what brought me back the spark and desire to get back to school and work in the education field. I quit my morning job and went back to school instead and worked in the after school program. I feel that the path that I took had to do a lot with the life transitions that I had everything just turned out the way that it was suppose to be.
- How might your own cultural background affect the efficacy of the career intervention strategies you chose to use with your students?
I feel that the way that it would affect it, would be if working with students that have not passed through any experience. I feel that sharing my own experience and how it worked out would motivate them to continue school or at least to give it a try. I came from a family where my parents did not attend college, so I did not know what to expect. Sharing all the resources and services that are out there might be helpful for those that finance might be a barrier. That is the only thing that I see can happen but other than that it would be a great experience.